A defence of the Humble remonstrance, against the frivolous and false exceptions of Smectymnvvs. Wherein the right of leiturgie and episcopacie is clearly vindicated from the vaine cavils, and challenges of the answerers. By the author of the said Humble remonstrance. Seconded (in way of appendance) with the judgement of the famous divine of the Palatinate, D. Abrahamus Scultetus, late professor of divinitie in the Universitie of Heidelberg: concerning the divine right of episcopacie, and the no-right of lay-eldership. Faithfully translated out of his Latine.
- All titles
-
- A defence of the Humble remonstrance, against the frivolous and false exceptions of Smectymnvvs. Wherein the right of leiturgie and episcopacie is clearly vindicated from the vaine cavils, and challenges of the answerers. By the author of the said Humble remonstrance. Seconded (in way of appendance) with the judgement of the famous divine of the Palatinate, D. Abrahamus Scultetus, late professor of divinitie in the Universitie of Heidelberg: concerning the divine right of episcopacie, and the no-right of lay-eldership. Faithfully translated out of his Latine.
- Defence of the Humble remonstrance, against the frivolous and false exceptions of Smectymnuus
- People / Organizations
-
- Imprint
-
London: printed for Nathaniel Butter in Pauls Church-yard at the pyde-Bull neare St. Austins gate, 1641.
- Publication year
- 1641-1641
- ESTC No.
- R188181
- Grub Street ID
- 76186
- Description
- [6], 168 [i.e. 164], [2], 169-200 [i.e. 190] p. ; 4⁰
- Note
- The author of "Humble remonstrance to the high court of Parliament" = Joseph Hall.
With a special title page: The determination of the question, concerning the divine right of episcopacie. By ... Abrahamus Scultetus ...
Second issue: on p. 168 (i.e. 164) the last paragraph is not leaded off from the preceding text, and there is an errata list at the foot of the page; sheets Q and Bb are in 2nd state, with correct reading "having" in l.4 on Q3 recto and Bb? verso correctly numbered 200 (i.e. 190).
Numerous errors in paging, including 85-88 and 183-192 omitted in the numbering, and p.175, 178-179, and 182 misnumbered 4, 10-11 and 14.